This act turns an accepted target record and a completed strength analysis into a line-relevance table.

For each moving line, pair the primary and transformed rows at the same bottom-up position. Record the relationship inside that pair. Then decide whether the line materially enters the target system. Activity alone is not a verdict.

Required input

Before starting, you need:

• the six primary rows and changed hexagram;
• every overt moving position;
• any Dark Moving flag, with its strict or working provenance already stated;
• the selected target and its support, obstacle, and support-blocker map;
• the line-strength record from Act 5.

If any of those inputs is unresolved, return to the earlier act. Do not repair construction during interpretation.

Lesson sequence

1. Pair moving and transformed rows without treating the pair as real-world causation.
2. Apply the course’s eight-dynamics checklist and expose its source and course-convention limits.
3. Check whether a line combines or clashes with its own transformed branch.
4. Filter several active lines by target relevance.
5. Replace the “dominant line” shortcut with a target-first record.
6. Inspect interval lines only when a named intermediary is relevant.

The artifact

Position	Moving row	Transformed row	Pair facts	Target relation	Keep / background / stop	Confidence

“Background” does not mean meaningless. It means the line has no demonstrated place in the current target decision. Do not invent a subplot to give every row a role.

Boundaries

• “Cause/effect” is course shorthand for primary/transformed order, not physical causation.
• Favorable/unfavorable category labels are not outcome facts.
• Three or more moving lines do not automatically prove instability or a particular result.
• A social role assigned to an interval line is an attributed lineage reading, not an observable person.
• Low confidence and not relevant are accepted outputs.

Source position

The checked Zengshan Buyi and Bushi Zhengzong chapters support named movement and transformation rules. The worksheets make line pairing and selected classifications reproducible by the reader. UAYA’s relevance table, confidence labels, and stopping rules are editorial synthesis.

Next, pair one moving row with the transformed row at the same position: Moving and Transformed Lines.

The modules

6.1 Bian Yao: Moving and Transformed Lines

Pair each moving line with its transformed line and separate derived chart order from claims about real-world causation.

6.2 The Eight-Dynamics Checklist

Classify moving/transformed pairs while distinguishing textual rules, observable chart facts, and course synthesis.

6.3 Self-Transform to Combine or Clash

Check whether a moving branch combines or clashes with its own transformed branch without turning the relation into an event claim.

6.4 Multiple Moving Lines

Filter several active lines by their demonstrated relation to the selected target and preserve low-confidence stops.

6.5 Target-First Filtering, Not a Dominant Line

Why this course ranks moving lines by demonstrated target relevance rather than by visual or calendar prominence alone.

6.6 Jian Yao: When an Intermediary Is Relevant

Identify lines between World and Response, then record a social role only when the question and mechanics support it.