Traditional scholarly desk with separate reading dossiers for different life domains

Act 9

Domain Applications

Routing before interpretation

Act 9 teaches one task: decide how a question should be routed before domain language changes the reading.

This act does not supply career, health, legal, financial, relationship, travel, document, or weather predictions. It builds a domain routing dossier that keeps the question, real-world authority, evidence, and target-selection method separate. Refer and stop are complete outputs.

The dossier

Copy this record before choosing a domain lesson:

Question as asked:
Exact subject:
Requested output:
Time window:
Real-world decision owner:
External facts still needed:
Evidence lane: chart fact / received rule / source record / UAYA workflow / external fact
Routing decision: continue / narrow / refer / stop
Target-selection handoff, if permitted:

The dossier is a UAYA teaching tool. It is not a received classical form.

Evidence lanes

LabelWhat belongs thereWhat does not
Chart factA visible or reproducible field in a castA real-world event or decision
Received ruleA rule with an exact text or lineage locatorAn inherited shortcut with no checkable source
Source recordWhat a cited case text recordsProof that the method predicts correctly
UAYA workflowThe dossier, safety screen, comparison, or exercise used in this courseA claim about historical practice
External factStatus, measurement, permission, decision, or advice owned outside WWGA symbolic interpretation

Do not move an external fact into the chart-fact lane. A line cannot establish a diagnosis, legal right, account balance, transport status, another person’s consent, document validity, or current forecast.

Choose the route by the learner task

RouteComplete the page when you can…Stop or refer when…
CareerName the institution, decision owner, and personal choice separatelyThe requested output is a job, exam, appointment, or promotion verdict
WealthSeparate known figures, personal agency, and optional reflectionThe chart is being asked to select an action or predict gain or loss
HealthRecord the qualified authority and factual sourceThe prompt asks for diagnosis, treatment, severity, recovery, or prognosis
RomanceReframe the question around the reader’s own agencyIt asks for another person’s private motives, fidelity, consent, or guaranteed choice
LegalIdentify the jurisdiction, official record, and appropriate authorityRights, procedure, deadlines, strategy, evidence, penalty, or outcome matter
TravelIdentify the operator, advisory, weather, and permission sourcesCurrent status or safety is unresolved
DocumentsDistinguish arrival, status, approval, validity, signing, and disputeAn institution or qualified adviser owns the answer
WeatherStudy one historical case as a source-and-mechanics recordThe output would be a current forecast or practical weather advice
Broad lifeSplit one broad concern into separate owned tasksIt still asks for a total-life, fate, or lifespan verdict

Example and counterexample

Invented exercise: “How should I divide two hours between reviewing my chart-construction notes and doing the target-selection workshop?” This can become a low-stakes planning prompt. The decision remains with the learner, and the requested artifact is a study plan.

Counterexample: “Will the issuing office approve my application?” The office owns the answer. Record the official status source and choose refer; do not convert approval into a symbolic verdict.

Act 9 stopping condition

Stop when the requested output belongs to a person, institution, professional, measurement, or current information source outside WWG. If the prompt contains several independent tasks, narrow it. Only a bounded question that survives both checks may advance to target selection.

Source and scope note: The dossier, evidence lanes, route map, and four routing decisions are UAYA teaching workflows. Received target selection remains in the reader-facing selection-method lesson; this directory introduces no domain-to-line doctrine.

Begin by separating the topic from the thing a permitted reading would examine: Domain vs Target Line.

The modules