Act 8
Timing
The judgment says what the chart predicts. Timing asks when the chart expects that prediction to show itself.
Wen Wang Gua timing is not a score formula. It is a state-resolution method. First identify what state the target line is in. Then find the calendar event that releases, fills, triggers, stabilizes, completes, or lands that state.
This is the point where the reading becomes practically usable: verdict plus timing window. The method should produce a primary date, sensible backups, and a confidence tag rather than a vague “sometime soon.”
The target may be void, bound, clashed, quiet, moving, frame-dependent, or delayed by transformation.
Each state has a matching calendar event: fill, release, combine, clash, complete, or exit delay.
The same branch event can land as an hour, day, month, or year depending on the question and the chart.
What this act teaches
Timing starts by naming what kind of waiting the target is doing.
Void, bound, clashed, strong-and-quiet, moving, frame waiting, or transformation delay.
Fill void, break binds, stabilize clashes, trigger quiet strength, and land moving lines.
Near matters answer in hours or days. Far matters answer in months or years.
Frames and transformed branches can create their own timing locks.
When several timing indicators fire, use precedence instead of picking the most interesting one.
Working vocabulary
The branch event where the judgment should show itself.
The highest-confidence date produced by the state rule.
A lower-confidence date when the primary is missed, unclear, or school-dependent.
A month or larger marker if the day-scale candidate does not resolve.
Used for active, immediate, moving, or short-horizon questions.
Used for slow, structural, distant, or broad-horizon questions.
Where this leads
After Act 8, a reading can have both a verdict and a timing window. Act 9 then adapts that complete reading to question domains: illness, money, work, relationships, travel, legal matters, and more.
Checkpoint
By the end of Act 8, the reading has two outputs: what is likely to happen and when the chart expects it to show itself. You can name a primary timing candidate, backup candidates, and the confidence level for the timing track.
The modules
Why Wen Wang Gua timing starts with the target line's state rather than a numerical formula.
8.2The Four States of StasisThe core timing taxonomy: void, bound, static, and moving.
8.3Void TimingHow to time a target line that is currently missing force.
8.4Bound TimingHow to time a line or support path that is held by combination.
8.5Clashed TimingHow to time a target line that is unstable because it has been clashed.
8.6Strong-and-Quiet TimingHow to time a target line that is strong but not yet moving.
8.7Moving Line AccelerationHow to time a target line that is already in motion.
8.8Near and Far TimingHow to decide whether a timing rule should be read as hours, days, months, or years.
8.9Frame TimingHow three-branch frames create completion, healing, and acceleration dates.
8.10Transformation TimingHow a moving line's changed branch can delay the result.
8.11When Indicators ConflictHow to rank timing indicators when several rules apply at once.